1. Chiu, C.-Y., & Douglas, J. A. (2013). A nonparametric approach to cognitive diagnosis by proximity to ideal response patterns. Journal of Classification, 30, 225–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-013-9132-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. de la Torre, J. (2008). An empirically based method of Q-matrix validation for the DINA model: Development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45, 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17453984.2008.00069.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. de la Torre, J. (2009). DINA model and parameter estimation: A didactic. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998607309474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2008). Model evaluation and multiple strategies in cognitive diagnosis: An analysis of fraction subtraction data. Psychometrika, 73, 595–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9063-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. DeCarlo, L. T. (2011). On the analysis of fraction subtraction data: The DINA model, classification, latent class sizes, and the Q-matrix. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35, 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621610377081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. George, A. C., Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., Gross, J., & Ünlü, A. (2016). The R package CDM for cognitive diagnosis models. Journal of Statistical Software, 74, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v074.i02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Henson, R. A., Templin, J. L., & Willse, J. T. (2009). Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables. Psychometrika, 74(2), 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Houts, C. R., & Cai, L. (2016). flexMIRT R user’s manual version 3.5: Flexible multilevel multidimensional item analysis and test scoring. Chapel Hill, NC: Vector Psychometric Group.Google Scholar
9. McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Mislevy, R. J. (1996). Test theory reconceived. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 379–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17453984.1996.tb00498.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. https://www.statmodel.com/
12. R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
13. Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., George, A. C., & Ünlü, A. (2018). CDM: Cognitive diagnosis modeling. R package version 6. 2–91. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=CDM
14. Tatsuoka, C. (2002). Data analytic methods for latent partially ordered classification models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics), 51, 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9876.00272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Tatsuoka, K. K. (1984). Analysis of errors in fraction addition and subtraction problems (Report NIE-G-81-0002). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Computer-based Education Research Library.Google Scholar
16. Tatsuoka, K. K. (1985). A probabilistic model for diagnosing misconception by the pattern classification approach. Journal of Educational Statistics, 10, 55–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2006). Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. Psychological Methods, 11, 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

1. Mplus Manual 7 User's Guide Latent Class Analysis Sas
2. Mplus Manual 7 User's Guide Latent Class Analysis Stata
3. Samsung Pc Studio User's Guide

Mplus Manual 7 User's Guide Latent Class Analysis Sas

Mplus Manual 7 User's Guide Latent Class Analysis Stata

Mplus has many nice features to assist researchers conducting exploratory factor analysis. In the example below, we use the m255mplusnotesefa data set, which contains continuous, dichotomous and ordered categorical variables. Our data set has missing values on several of the variables that will.

15°, 25°, 40°, & Soap) make swiching applications easy and fast!. Downstream Detergent Injection System.Specifications. User's manual gx390 power washer soap assembly.

Samsung Pc Studio User's Guide

1. Dichotomous categorical outcome variables is very useful. Furthermore, Mplus will fit latent class analysis (LCA) models that contain categorical latent variables and fit mixture models that. Mplus Tutorial 7 The Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin. According to the Mplus User's Guide, 'The Mplus.
2. 5 Latent class models for multiple groups 61. VARIABLE and DEFINE which are used to set up data for analysis. 1.1 Mplus language. The user’s point of view, this in e ect turns Mplus into a.
3. May 10, 2012 LLCA, for Located Latent Class Analysis, estimates probit unidimensional latent class models, as described in Uebersax (1993). This is a discrete latent trait model, similar to the logistic unidimensional latent class (e.g., Lindsay, Clogg, and Grego, 1991), but based on a probit, rather than logistic assumptions. Download LLCA (llca.zip.